 |
*Taken from http://members.aol.com/vinny516/xmas/santareb.htm*
Rebuttal: Several key points are overlooked by this callous,
amateurish "study."
1) Flying reindeer: As is widely known due to the excellent
historical documentary "Santa Claus is Coming to Town,"
the flying reindeer are not a previously unknown species
of reindeer, but were in fact given the power of flight
due to eating magic acorns. As is conclusively proven in
"Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" (a no-punches-
pulled look at life in Santa's village), this ability has
bred true in subsequent generations of reindeer--obviously
the magic acorns imprinted their power on a dominant gene
sequence within the reindeer DNA strand.
2) Number of households: This figure overlooks two key
facts. First of all, the first major schism in the Church
split the Eastern Churches, centered in Byzantium, from
the Western, which remained centered in Rome. This occurred
prior to the Gregorian correction to the Julian calendar.
The Eastern churches (currently called Orthodox Churches)
do not recognize the Gregorian correction for liturgical
events, and their Christmas is, as a result, several days
after that of the Western Churches'. Thus, Santa gets two
shots at delivering toys.
Secondly, the figure of 3.5 children per household is based
on the gross demographic average, which includes households
with no children at all. The number of children per household,
when figured as an average for households with children,
would therefore have to be adjusted upward. Also, the largest
single Christian denomination is Roman Catholic, who, as
we all know, breed like rabbits. If you don't believe me,
ask my four brothers and two sisters--they'll back me up.
Due to the predominance of Catholics within Christian households,
the total number of households containing Christian children
would have to be adjusted downward to
reflect the overloading of Catholics beyond a standard deviation
from the median.
Also, the assertion that each home would contain at least
one good child would be reasonable enough if there were
in fact an even 3.5 children per household. However, since
the number of children per household is distributed integrally,
there is a significant number (on the order of several million)
of one-child Christian households. Even though only children
are notoriously spoiled--and therefore disproportionately
inclined toward being naughty--since it's the holidays we'll
be generous and give them a fifty-fifty chance of being
nice. This removes one half of the single-child households
from Santa's delivery schedule, which has already been reduced
by the removal of the Orthodox households from the first
delivery run.
3) Santa's delivery run (speed, payload, etc.): These all
suffer from the dubious supposition that there is only one
Santa Claus. The name "Santa" is obviously either
Spanish or Italian, two ethnic groups which are both overwhelmingly
Catholic. The last name Claus suggests a joint German/Italian
background. His beginnings, battling the Burgermeister Meisterburger,
suggest he grew up in Bavaria (also predominantly Catholic).
The Kaiser style helmets of the Burgermeister's guards,
coupled with the relative isolation of the village, suggest
that his youth was at the very beginning of Prussian influence
in Germany. Thus, Santa and Mrs. Claus have been together
for well over one hundred years. If you think that after
a hundred years of living at the North Pole with nights
six months long that they remain childless, you either don't
know Catholics or are unaware of the failure rate of the
rhythm method. There have therefore been over five generations
of Clauses, breeding like Catholics for over one hundred
years.
Since they are Catholic, their exponential population increase
would obviously have a gain higher than the world population
as a whole. There have therefore been more than enough new
Santas to overcome the population increase of the world.
So in fact, Santa has an easier time of it now than he did
when he first started out.
Santa dead, indeed--some people will twist any statistic
to "prove" their cynical theory.
|